Costanalyst
Use case

Multi-Cloud Cost Management Across AWS, GCP, and Azure

Stop stitching three billing consoles together. Costanalyst unifies AWS, GCP, and Azure spend in one view, attributed and optimized the same way across all of them.

See how it works
Read-only Never moves money
Spend Console
Sample data
Connected AWS GCP Azure SaaS
Find savings in
Identified

projected this month if unattended

Spend by team

Budget forecast

Projected EoQ $124k
With savings
Read-only · Sample data

In short

Multi-cloud cost management unifies spend across more than one cloud provider into a single view. Costanalyst connects AWS, GCP, and Azure billing read-only, normalizes the spend, applies the same waste detection and attribution across all three, and forecasts the combined run-rate, so a finance or platform team manages one picture instead of reconciling three separate consoles.

// THE FIT

Why it fits

Teams running on more than one cloud who need a single, consistent cost view.

One unified view

AWS, GCP, and Azure spend normalized into a single picture.

Consistent optimization

The same waste detection and rightsizing applied across every cloud.

Combined forecast

One run-rate and projection across all your providers.

// FAQ

Questions people ask

Multi-cloud, answered

What is multi-cloud cost management?

Multi-cloud cost management unifies spend from more than one cloud provider, typically AWS, GCP, and Azure, into a single connected view instead of three separate billing consoles. It normalizes the data so spend, waste, and attribution are comparable across providers rather than reported in each provider's own format.

Why is multi-cloud cost harder to manage than a single cloud?

Each provider bills, tags, and discounts differently, so the same workload can look different across consoles even when the underlying cost logic is similar. Without a normalization layer, a finance or platform team ends up manually reconciling three exports into one spreadsheet every month, and waste detection has to be repeated separately for each cloud.

How do you compare AWS, GCP, and Azure spend in one view?

Comparing them requires mapping each provider's billing categories and discount structures to a common set of cost dimensions, such as service, team, and environment, so a dollar of AWS EC2 and a dollar of Azure compute land in the same bucket. Costanalyst connects to all three read-only and applies this normalization automatically.

Does multi-cloud cost management find the same waste as single-cloud tools?

The waste categories are similar (idle resources, oversized instances, missed commitment discounts) but each provider needs its own detection logic, since the underlying resource types and pricing models differ. A multi-cloud tool applies consistent detection across all three providers so no cloud gets a lighter check than the others.

How does Costanalyst handle multi-cloud cost management?

Costanalyst connects AWS, GCP, and Azure billing read-only, normalizes the spend into one view, applies the same waste detection and attribution rules across all three, and forecasts the combined run-rate. A finance or platform team gets one picture instead of reconciling three consoles by hand.

Find your savings, in dollars

Connect your cloud and SaaS spend read-only and see exactly where to save. Money never moves. No card to start.